blackrthanblack: (Huh What)
Shiyoko // Barbaros "Barbie" Rosencrantz ([personal profile] blackrthanblack) wrote2012-03-01 02:07 am

(no subject)

Anyone else find it odd that there's 14 girls in the WRGP to 11 guys? I never figured Duel Monsters was that much of a chick's sport.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Makes sense to me. It's not a contact sport, and it's easy to dress girls up in sexy outfits, so there's naturally an idol sort of appeal.

Though, really, 14 to 11 isn't much of a margin. It could end up closing a lot more if a few teams get knocked out... or even go the other way entirely.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
Well I'm going to note it was 18 to 13 a few days ago. I just find it baffling we have so many chicks competing.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
And I'll note I think half or more of the girls aren't dressin' sexy. I think that mostly lands towards me and Saikou. And maybe that Aki chick.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
Well, that comment really more fits professional dueling than the tournament.

Though, considering Domino, it's not really a surprise there are a number of women who want to prove themselves.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Why. What about Domino and feminism?

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
Not feminism so much, just stronger personality types. Or. More bold, rather.

Considering all the chaos we have here, it's only natural the more stubborn people would stick around... or even move in.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 05:44 am (UTC)(link)
Not sure ta take that as a compliment or an insult.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
You're a very bold type, I think. I mean, if you saw a fist fight, you'd probably hop into the fray. That's the sort of thing I mean.

In your case, it'd be more 'to break it up, or otherwise dispense justice', but still.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Still unsure how to take that.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
Take it neutrally? It can be both a good and a bad thing to be bold. Just as it can be both good and bad to be shy. Or being neutral with both can make one bland.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
... I'm confused. ... You want me to be shy?

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 07:16 am (UTC)(link)
...no? I'm saying it's fine whatever type you are, since there's positives and negatives to just about any.

...except for the types that are exploitative, or crazy obsessive, but you're neither, so it's fine.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
I might be obsessed, just a tad.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
A tad is fine. I'm thinking more crazy obsessed.

[identity profile] blackrthanblack.livejournal.com 2012-03-02 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
I see. Anyways....